What a thoughtful and in-depth consideration of the whole question of titles for visual art. In a way, though, isn't 'Untitled' also a form of title, explicitly taking a stance in relation to names and language? And I wonder if there's a parallel here between those who feel it's unnecessary to know the names of birds, plants and wildlife in order to appreciate them, and those who feel that naming, and the knowledge that often goes along with that, deepens our relationship and our attentiveness?
Ooh, that's a useful parallel. I can go with that, happy to appreciate with as little or as much additional information available to me.
Not everyone will feel so confident in that direction, especially if they're unfamiliar with exploring art. Since it's the artist's choice to name with the lack of name, I wonder if a group of untitled artworks could still be curated under a theme or a point of discussion introduced by the artist. The more distant and lacking in voice to leave all consideration and appreciation up to the viewer, the more the risk that viewers will feel left out or alienated for the reasons you gave in your post.
I can see valid reasons for deliberately vague/abstract choices, and I hope balance can prevail either way.
I really look forward to your final decision for titling your latest artwork. It's been fun to explore it through numerous lenses during this process.
Inspiration from image is a fantastic place to start! Speaking of which, the way you present your article title images for Ten Thousand Journeys is so good. It pleases me, and it's unique to you.
What a thoughtful and in-depth consideration of the whole question of titles for visual art. In a way, though, isn't 'Untitled' also a form of title, explicitly taking a stance in relation to names and language? And I wonder if there's a parallel here between those who feel it's unnecessary to know the names of birds, plants and wildlife in order to appreciate them, and those who feel that naming, and the knowledge that often goes along with that, deepens our relationship and our attentiveness?
Ooh, that's a useful parallel. I can go with that, happy to appreciate with as little or as much additional information available to me.
Not everyone will feel so confident in that direction, especially if they're unfamiliar with exploring art. Since it's the artist's choice to name with the lack of name, I wonder if a group of untitled artworks could still be curated under a theme or a point of discussion introduced by the artist. The more distant and lacking in voice to leave all consideration and appreciation up to the viewer, the more the risk that viewers will feel left out or alienated for the reasons you gave in your post.
I can see valid reasons for deliberately vague/abstract choices, and I hope balance can prevail either way.
I really look forward to your final decision for titling your latest artwork. It's been fun to explore it through numerous lenses during this process.
I agree about the title being important. It’s strange how these things work, but as a writer, I often start with a picture/ photograph.
Inspiration from image is a fantastic place to start! Speaking of which, the way you present your article title images for Ten Thousand Journeys is so good. It pleases me, and it's unique to you.